SB-0249, As Passed Senate, June 11, 2009
SUBSTITUTE FOR
SENATE BILL NO. 249
A bill to make appropriations for the judicial branch for the
fiscal year ending September 30, 2010; to provide for the
expenditure of these appropriations; to place certain restrictions
on the expenditure of these appropriations; to prescribe the powers
and duties of certain state and local departments, officials, and
employees; to require certain reports; and to provide for the
disposition of fees and other income received by the judicial
branch.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN ENACT:
PART 1
LINE-ITEM APPROPRIATIONS
Sec. 101. Subject to the conditions set forth in this act, the
amounts listed in this part are appropriated for the judicial
Senate Bill No. 249 as amended June 10, 2009
branch for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2010, from the
funds indicated in this part. The following is a summary of the
appropriations in this part:
JUDICIARY
APPROPRIATION SUMMARY
Full-time equated exempted positions............ 491.0
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ <<258,529,300>>
Interdepartmental grant revenues:
Total interdepartmental grants and intradepartmental
transfers............................................ 3,553,500
ADJUSTED GROSS APPROPRIATION........................... $ 254,975,700
Federal revenues:
Total federal revenues................................. <<5,126,500>>
Special revenue funds:
Total local revenues................................... 6,149,300
Total private revenues................................. 842,500
Total other state restricted revenues.................. 88,605,600
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 154,251,900
Sec. 102. SUPREME COURT
Full-time equated exempted positions............ 243.0
Supreme court administration--97.0 FTE positions....... $ 10,548,400
Judicial institute--13.0 FTE positions................. 2,554,500
State court administrative office--60.0 FTE positions.. 11,009,200
Judicial information systems--22.0 FTE positions....... 3,092,100
Direct trial court automation support--36.0 FTE
positions............................................ 6,149,300
Foster care review board--12.0 FTE positions........... 1,235,000
Senate Bill No. 249 as amended June 10, 2009
Community dispute resolution--3.0 FTE positions........ 2,300,400
Other federal grants................................... 275,000
Drug treatment courts.................................. 5,132,900
Mental health treatment courts......................... 100
<<Juvenile training pilot project...................... 100>>
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ <<42,297,000>>
Appropriated from:
Interdepartmental grant revenues:
IDG from department of community health................ 1,800,000
IDG from department of corrections..................... 1,030,000
IDG from state police - Michigan justice training fund. 300,000
Federal revenues:
DOJ, victims assistance programs....................... 50,000
DOJ, drug court training and evaluation................ 300,000
DOT, national highway traffic safety administration.... 1,300,000
HHS, access and visitation grant....................... 387,000
HHS, children's justice grant.......................... 206,300
HHS, court improvement project......................... 1,160,000
HHS, title IV-D child support program.................. 907,700
HHS, title IV-E foster care program.................... 540,400
Other federal grant revenues........................... <<275,100>>
Special revenue funds:
Local - user fees...................................... 6,149,300
Private................................................ 169,000
Private - interest on lawyers trust accounts........... 232,700
Private - state justice institute...................... 370,800
Community dispute resolution fund...................... 2,300,400
Law exam fees.......................................... 536,200
Drug court fund........................................ 1,920,500
Miscellaneous revenue.................................. 227,900
Justice system fund.................................... 700,000
State court fund....................................... 339,000
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 21,094,700
Sec. 103. COURT OF APPEALS
Full-time equated exempted positions............ 190.0
Court of appeals operations--190.0 FTE positions....... $ 18,414,300
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 18,414,300
Appropriated from:
Special revenue funds:
Court filing/motion fees............................... 1,958,500
Miscellaneous revenue.................................. 77,800
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 16,378,000
Sec. 104. BRANCHWIDE APPROPRIATIONS
Full-time equated exempted positions.............. 4.0
Branchwide appropriations--4.0 FTE positions........... $ 8,039,400
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 8,039,400
Appropriated from:
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 8,039,400
Sec. 105. JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION
Full-time judges positions...................... 617.0
Supreme court justices' salaries--7.0 justices......... $ 1,152,300
Court of appeals judges' salaries--28.0 judges......... 4,240,300
District court judges' state base salaries--258.0
judges............................................... 23,877,200
District court judicial salary standardization......... 11,796,800
Probate court judges' state base salaries--103.0
judges............................................... 9,627,900
Probate court judicial salary standardization.......... 4,669,700
Circuit court judges' state base salaries--221.0
judges............................................... 20,817,200
Circuit court judicial salary standardization.......... 10,105,000
Judges' retirement system defined contributions........ 3,781,000
OASI, social security.................................. 5,468,400
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 95,535,800
Appropriated from:
Special revenue funds:
Court fee fund......................................... 7,090,200
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 88,445,600
Sec. 106. JUDICIAL AGENCIES
Full-time equated exempted positions.............. 7.0
Judicial tenure commission--7.0 FTE positions.......... $ 969,700
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 969,700
Appropriated from:
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 969,700
Sec. 107. INDIGENT DEFENSE - CRIMINAL
Full-time equated exempted positions............. 47.0
Appellate public defender program--39.0 FTE positions.. $ 4,900,500
Appellate assigned counsel administration--8.0 FTE
positions............................................ 908,800
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 5,809,300
Appropriated from:
Interdepartmental grant revenues:
IDG from state police - Michigan justice training fund. 423,500
Special revenue funds:
Private - interest on lawyers trust accounts........... 70,000
Miscellaneous revenue.................................. 113,100
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 5,202,700
Sec. 108. INDIGENT CIVIL LEGAL ASSISTANCE
Indigent civil legal assistance........................ $ 7,937,000
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 7,937,000
Appropriated from:
Special revenue funds:
State court fund....................................... 7,937,000
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 0
Sec. 109. TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS
Court equity fund reimbursements....................... $ 64,561,800
Judicial technology improvement fund................... 4,815,000
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 69,376,800
Appropriated from:
Special revenue funds:
Court equity fund...................................... 50,440,000
Judicial technology improvement fund................... 4,815,000
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 14,121,800
Sec. 110. GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS TO LOCAL
GOVERNMENT
Drug case-flow program................................. $ 250,000
Drunk driving case-flow program........................ 3,300,000
Juror compensation reimbursement....................... 6,600,000
GROSS APPROPRIATION.................................... $ 10,150,000
Appropriated from:
Special revenue funds:
Drug fund.............................................. 250,000
Drunk driving fund..................................... 3,300,000
Juror compensation fund................................ 6,600,000
State general fund/general purpose..................... $ 0
PART 2
PROVISIONS CONCERNING APPROPRIATIONS
GENERAL SECTIONS
Sec. 201. Pursuant to section 30 of article IX of the state
constitution of 1963, total state spending from state resources
under part 1 for fiscal year 2009-2010 is $242,857,500.00 and state
spending from state resources to be paid to local units of
government for fiscal year 2009-2010 is $121,980,500.00. The
itemized statement below identifies appropriations from which
spending to local units of government will occur:
JUDICIARY
SUPREME COURT
State court administrative office...................... $ 511,900
Drug treatment courts.................................. 4,832,900
TRIAL COURT OPERATIONS
Court equity fund reimbursements....................... $ 64,561,800
Judicial technology improvement fund................... 4,815,000
JUSTICES' AND JUDGES' COMPENSATION
District court judicial salary standardization......... $ 11,796,800
Probate court judges' state base salaries.............. 9,627,900
Probate court judicial salary standardization.......... 4,669,700
Circuit court judicial salary standardization.......... 10,105,000
Grant to OASI contribution fund, employers share,
social security..................................... 909,500
GRANTS AND REIMBURSEMENTS TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Drunk driving case-flow program........................ $ 3,300,000
Drug case-flow program................................. 250,000
Juror compensation reimbursement....................... 6,600,000
TOTAL.................................................. $ 121,980,500
Sec. 202. (1) The appropriations authorized under this act are
subject to the management and budget act, 1984 PA 431, MCL 18.1101
to 18.1594.
(2) Funds appropriated in part 1 to an entity within the
judicial branch shall not be expended or transferred to another
account without written approval of the authorized agent of the
judicial entity. If the authorized agent of the judicial entity
notifies the state budget director of its approval of an
expenditure or transfer, the state budget director shall
immediately make the expenditure or transfer. The authorized
judicial entity agent shall be designated by the chief justice of
the supreme court.
Sec. 203. As used in this act:
(a) "DOJ" means the United States department of justice.
(b) "DOT" means the United States department of
transportation.
(c) "FTE" means full-time equated.
(d) "HHS" means the United States department of health and
human services.
(e) "IDG" means interdepartmental grant.
(f) "OASI" means old age survivor's insurance.
Sec. 204. The judicial branch shall not take disciplinary
action against an employee for communicating with a member of the
legislature or his or her staff.
Sec. 208. The reporting requirements of this act shall be
completed with the approval of, and at the direction of, the
supreme court. The judicial branch shall use the Internet to
fulfill the reporting requirements of this act. This may include
transmission of reports via electronic mail to the recipients
identified for each reporting requirement, or it may include
placement of reports on an Internet or Intranet site.
Sec. 212. As a condition of expending appropriations made
under part 1, the judicial branch shall receive and retain copies
of all reports funded from appropriations in part 1 and shall
follow federal and state guidelines for short-term and long-term
retention of such reports and records.
Sec. 214. Funds appropriated in part 1 shall not be used for
the purchase of foreign goods or services, or both, if
competitively priced and of comparable quality American goods or
services, or both, are available. Preference shall be given to
goods or services, or both, manufactured or provided by Michigan
businesses, if they are competitively priced and of comparable
quality. In addition, preference shall be given to goods or
services, or both, that are manufactured or provided by Michigan
businesses owned and operated by veterans, if they are
competitively priced and of comparable quality.
Sec. 215. (1) Due to the current budgetary problems in this
state, out-of-state travel for the fiscal year ending September 30,
2009 shall be limited to situations in which 1 or more of the
following conditions apply:
(a) The travel is required by legal mandate or court order or
for law enforcement purposes.
(b) The travel is necessary to protect the health or safety of
Michigan citizens or visitors or to assist other states in similar
circumstances.
(c) The travel is necessary to produce budgetary savings or to
increase state revenues, including protecting existing federal
funds or securing additional federal funds.
(d) The travel is necessary to comply with federal
requirements.
(e) The travel is necessary to secure specialized training for
staff that is not available within this state.
(f) The travel is financed entirely by federal or nonstate
funds.
(2) If out-of-state travel is necessary but does not meet 1 or
more of the conditions in subsection (1), the chief justice or his
or her designee may grant an exception to allow the travel. Any
exceptions granted by the chief justice or his or her designee
shall be reported on a monthly basis to the senate and house of
representatives standing committees on appropriations.
(3) Not later than January 1 of each year, the state court
administrative office shall prepare a travel report listing all
travel by judicial branch employees outside this state in the
immediately preceding fiscal year that was funded in whole or in
part with funds appropriated in the budget for the judicial branch.
The report shall be submitted to the senate and house of
representatives standing committees on appropriations, the senate
and house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director. The
report shall include the following information:
(a) The name of each person receiving reimbursement for travel
outside this state or whose travel costs were paid by this state.
(b) The destination of each travel occurrence.
(c) The dates of each travel occurrence.
(d) A brief statement of the reason for each travel
occurrence.
(e) The transportation and related costs of each travel
occurrence, including the proportion funded with state general
fund/general purpose revenues, the proportion funded with state
restricted revenues, the proportion funded with federal revenues,
and the proportion funded with other revenues.
(f) A total of all out-of-state travel funded for the
immediately preceding fiscal year.
Sec. 216. (1) The judicial branch shall report no later than
April 1, 2010 on each specific policy change made to implement a
public act affecting the judicial branch that took effect during
the prior calendar year to the house and senate appropriations
subcommittees on the judicial branch budget, the joint committee on
administrative rules, and the senate and house fiscal agencies.
(2) Funds appropriated in part 1 shall not be used by the
judicial branch to adopt a rule that will apply to a small business
and that will have a disproportionate economic impact on small
businesses because of the size of those businesses if the judicial
branch fails to reduce the disproportionate economic impact of the
rule on small businesses as provided under section 40 of the
administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.240.
(3) As used in this section:
(a) "Rule" means that term as defined under section 7 of the
administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL 24.207.
(b) "Small business" means that term as defined under section
7a of the administrative procedures act of 1969, 1969 PA 306, MCL
24.207a.
Sec. 218. The judicial branch shall not approve the travel of
more than 1 judicial employee to a specific professional
development conference or training seminar that is located outside
of this state unless a professional development conference or
training seminar is funded by a federal or private funding source
and requires more than 1 person from the judicial branch to attend,
or the conference or training seminar includes multiple issues in
which 1 employee from the judicial branch does not have expertise.
Sec. 219. Not later than September 30, 2010, the judiciary
shall prepare and transmit a report that provides for estimates of
the total general fund/general purpose appropriation lapses at the
close of the fiscal year. This report shall summarize the projected
year-end general fund/general purpose appropriation lapses by major
program or program areas. The report shall be transmitted to the
office of the state budget, the chairpersons of the senate and
house appropriations committees, and the senate and house fiscal
agencies.
JUDICIAL BRANCH
Sec. 301. (1) The direct trial court automation support
program of the state court administrative office shall recover
direct and overhead costs from trial courts by charging for
services rendered. The fee shall cover the actual costs incurred to
the direct trial court automation support program in providing the
service, including development of future versions of case
management systems. A report of amounts collected in excess of
funds identified as user service charges in part 1 shall be
submitted to the state budget director and to the house and senate
appropriations subcommittees on judiciary 30 days before
expenditure by the direct trial court automation support program.
(2) From funds appropriated in part 1, the direct trial court
automation support program of the state court administrative office
shall provide to the state budget director, the senate and house
appropriations committees, and the senate and house fiscal agencies
before January 1 of each year a detailed list of user service
charges collected during the immediately preceding state fiscal
year.
Sec. 302. Funds appropriated within the judicial branch shall
not be expended by any component within the judicial branch without
the approval of the supreme court.
Sec. 303. Of the amount appropriated in part 1 for the
judicial branch, $325,000.00 is allocated for circuit court
reimbursement under section 3 of 1978 PA 16, MCL 800.453, and
$186,900.00 is allocated for court of claims reimbursement under
section 6413 of the revised judicature act of 1961, 1961 PA 236,
MCL 600.6413.
Sec. 304. As a condition of expending appropriations made
under part 1, the judicial branch shall cooperate with the auditor
general regarding audits of the judicial branch conducted under
section 53 of article IV of the state constitution of 1963.
Sec. 305. As a condition of expending appropriations made
under part 1, and to avoid the overexpenditure of funds
appropriated under this act, the supreme court shall report
quarterly to members of the senate and house appropriations
subcommittees on the judiciary, the senate and house fiscal
agencies, and the state budget director on the status of accounts
set forth in part 1. The report required by this section shall
include quarterly, year-to-date, and projected expenditures by
funding source for each line item, and beginning balances and
quarterly, year-to-date, and projected revenues for each source of
revenue other than general fund/general purpose revenues.
Sec. 306. The supreme court and the state court administrative
office shall continue to maintain, as a priority, the assisting of
local trial courts in improving the collection of judgments.
Sec. 308. If sufficient funds are not available from the court
fee fund to pay judges' compensation, the difference between the
appropriated amount from that fund for judges' compensation and the
actual amount available after the amount appropriated for trial
court reimbursement is made shall be appropriated from the state
general fund for judges' compensation.
Sec. 309. By April 1, 2010, the state court administrative
office shall provide an update on the status of the pilot mental
health courts to the state budget director, the senate and house
appropriations subcommittees on the judiciary, and the senate and
house fiscal agencies.
Sec. 310. From the funds appropriated in part 1 for drug
treatment court programs, with the approval of and at the
discretion of the supreme court, the state court administrative
office shall evaluate and collect data on the performance of drug
treatment court programs. The state court administrative office
shall provide an annual review of the performance of drug courts as
prescribed in section 1078(6) of the revised judicature act of
1961, 1961 PA 236, MCL 600.1078. All of the following apply to that
annual review:
(a) It shall include measures of the impact of drug court
programs in changing offender criminal involvement (recidivism) and
substance abuse and in reducing prison admissions.
(b) It shall be completed no later than April 1 of each year
and shall also be provided to the senate and house appropriations
subcommittees on the judiciary, the senate and house fiscal
agencies, and the state budget director.
(c) The evaluation of a program funded with federal Byrne
funds shall be consistent with the requirements contained in the
federal Byrne grant for that program.
Sec. 311. (1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for drug
treatment courts shall be administered by the state court
administrative office to operate drug treatment court programs. A
drug treatment court shall be responsible for handling cases
involving substance abusing nonviolent offenders through
comprehensive supervision, testing, treatment services, and
immediate sanctions and incentives. A drug treatment court shall
use all available county and state personnel involved in the
disposition of cases including, but not limited to, parole and
probation agents, prosecuting attorneys, defense attorneys, and
community corrections providers. The funds may be used in
connection with other federal, state, and local funding sources.
(2) From the funds appropriated in part 1, the chief justice
shall allocate sufficient funds for the judicial institute to
provide in-state training for those identified in subsection (1),
including training for new drug treatment court judges.
(3) For drug treatment court grants, consideration for
priority may be given to those courts where higher instances of
substance abuse cases are filed.
(4) The judiciary shall receive $1,800,000.00 in Byrne formula
grant funding as an interdepartmental grant from the department of
community health to be used for expansion of drug treatment courts,
to assist in avoiding prison bed space growth for nonviolent
offenders in collaboration with the department of corrections.
Sec. 312. From the funds appropriated in part 1, the state
court administrator shall produce a statistical report regarding
the implementation of the parental rights restoration act, 1990 PA
211, MCL 722.901 to 722.908, as it pertains to minors seeking a
court-issued waiver of parental consent. The state court
administrative office shall report the total number of petitions
filed and the total number of petitions granted in accordance with
section 208.
Sec. 314. The legislature requests that the state court
administrative office conduct a survey of trial courts in order to
determine best practices for standardized risk assessment and
submit a report to the state budget director, the senate and house
appropriations subcommittees on the judiciary, and the senate and
house fiscal agencies by April 1. The state court administrative
office is encouraged to explore existing tools and established
benchmarks that could be utilized in addressing the criminogenic
needs of the local community.
Sec. 317. Funds appropriated in part 1 shall not be used for
the permanent assignment of state-owned vehicles to justices or
judges or any other judicial branch employee. This section does not
preclude the use of state-owned motor pool vehicles for state
business in accordance with approved guidelines.
Sec. 318. (1) The judiciary shall receive $980,000.00 as an
interdepartmental grant from the department of corrections. The
funds shall be utilized by the state court administrative office to
administer a pilot program to target high-risk offenders through
assessment, treatment, and accountability, with the goal of
reducing future criminal behavior. All funds shall be spent on
fulfilling the requirements of this section and treatment,
monitoring, and testing of offenders in the pilot program
administered by the state court administrative office.
(2) The pilot program shall adhere to the following criteria:
(a) A minimum of 3 pilot sites shall be selected by the state
court administrative office, at least 1 to be located in a major
metropolitan area.
(b) The pilot programs shall incorporate the principles and
practices of problem-solving courts developed by the national
association of drug court professionals, and they shall operate
pursuant to a written memorandum of understanding developed by the
stakeholders in the jurisdiction.
(c) Each pilot court team shall include, at a minimum, a
district and circuit judge, prosecutor, defense lawyer, treatment
provider, circuit court probation officer, district court probation
officer, community corrections representative, community mental
health representative, court administration, and community
representative.
(d) Before being enrolled in the pilot program, each
participant shall be administered a comprehensive and valid risk
and needs assessment. The assessment shall measure criminogenic and
psychosocial factors to determine which participants are at
significant risk of/for committing further crimes and are in need
of services.
(e) The pilot projects shall employ evidence-based practices
to develop a treatment plan in response to the assessment results.
(f) Each pilot project shall employ a case manager whose
duties shall include referral and linkage to community resources,
monitoring treatment plan requirements, data reporting, and other
responsibilities as assigned.
Senate Bill No. 249 as amended June 10, 2009
(3) The Michigan judicial institute shall provide appropriate
training for all personnel involved in the pilot program.
(4) The state court administrative office shall conduct a
process and outcome evaluation and a cost-benefit analysis of the
pilot programs and shall submit that analysis to the senate and
house appropriations subcommittees on the judiciary, the senate and
house fiscal agencies, and the state budget director by September
30, 2010.
<<Sec. 319. (1) The funds appropriated in part 1 for the juvenile training pilot project shall be used for the purpose of training criminal defense attorneys who accept court-appointed cases concerning juvenile delinquency, abuse, neglect, and protective services. The judiciary shall contract with the state appellate defender office’s criminal defense resource center, which provides training to court-assigned criminal defense attorneys at trial and appellate levels.
(2) Training shall include, but not be limited to, identification of potential trainees, collection of information about the services they provide to court-assigned clients, collection of resources for web access, hosting of direct training events, creation of new resources including practice manuals, and creation of a training network.>>