FY 2013-14 STATE POLICE BUDGET                                                        S.B. 185 (S-1):  SUMMARY OF DIFFERENCES

 

 

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                 House Bill is H.B. 4328

 

FY 2013-14 Senate-Passed Gross Appropriation.................................................................

$600,601,700

 

House Changes to Senate-Passed:

 

  1.  Disaster and Emergency Response Contingency Fund.  House reduced the Governor's recommendation of $4.0 million GF/GP for an emergency fund down to $3.0 million; the Senate included no appropriations for the fund.

1,000,000

  2.  Michigan International Speedway (MIS) Traffic Control Support.  House did not include $800,000 in GF/GP funds for traffic control support for at MIS races.

(800,000)

  3.  Information Technology Upgrades.  House reduced Information Technology by $132,100 Gross, $101,800 GF/GP.

(132,100)

  4.  Nuclear Power Plant Emergency Planning.  The House added $517,300 restricted in a technical adjustment to reflect actual funds expected to be received.

517,300

 

Total Changes.....................................................................................................................

$585,200

FY 2013-14 House-Passed Gross Appropriation..................................................................

$601,186,900


FY 2013-14 STATE POLICE BUDGET                                                                                  BOILERPLATE HIGHLIGHTS

Changes from FY 2013-14 Senate-Passed:

  1.  IDGs Received.  The House did not include the listing of IDGs received under part 1.  (Sec. 204)

  2.  Buy American Language.  House added preference to small businesses with at least 35% of work made up of veterans.  (Sec. 209)

  3.  Deprived and Depressed.  House did not include language requiring steps to ensure areas of the state which are deprived and depressed receive consideration for department contracts.  (Sec. 210)

  4.  Information Technology Work Projects.  House added language which allows designation of info tech projects as work projects per DTMB act.  (Sec. 211)

  5.  Information Technology Fees.  House added language requiring user fees for services provided by DTMB.  (Sec. 214)

  6.  Budgetary Efficiency.  House deleted a requirement that the MSP engage in strategies to find fiscal efficiencies in the budget.  (Sec. 217)

  7.  Quarterly Reports.  House did not include a requirement that quarterly reports include the status of performance metrics.  (Sec. 219)

  8.  Annual Reports.  The House included language requiring a detailed report on school bus inspections, Secondary Road Patrol Grant Program revenues, and casino gaming oversight.  (Sec. 220)

  9.  Core Services Listing.  The House did not include an updated and consolidated list of core services which the Senate included.  (Sec. 221)

10.  Privatization.  House eliminated language requiring 60-day notice prior to effort to privatize department functions and a subsequent report.  (Sec. 223)

11.  Subsidy for Contractual Services Provided.  House included language stating its intent that the MSP shall not subsidize any contractual services it provides.  (Sec. 226)

12.  Radio Interoperability.  House included language requiring the MSP provide a definition of interoperability and monitor compliance to interoperability standards throughout the state and to provide a report.  (Sec. 227)

13.  Unclassified Positions.  The House did not include a listing of the titles of the MSP's unclassified position titles and a requirement that it notify the legislature prior to when they would request a new such position.  (Sec. 250)

14.  Executive Direction.  House did not include language which requires effective and efficient leadership from MSP's Executive Direction section.  (Sec. 251)

15.  Special Operations and Events.  House did not include a requirement that the MSP's Special Operations and Events section provide sufficient protection for the Governor and visiting dignitaries.  (Sec. 252)

16.  Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards.  House did not include language requiring an update of standards within 30 days following the effective date of any amending legislation.  (Sec. 302)

17.  Sex Offender Registry Tips.  House did not include language requiring the MSP to follow up on violation tips assigned to local law enforcement agencies within 10 working days.  (Sec. 303)

18.  Traffic/Enforcement Patrols.  House did not included language requiring a minimum of 300,000 hours of statewide patrols.  (Sec. 503)

19.  Sex Offender Registry Compliance.  House did not include language requiring staff sufficient to maintain a 93% compliance rate for reporting by those registered.  (Sec. 501)

20.  Michigan Intelligence Operations Center.  House did not include language requiring operations of the center and efforts to increase the number of contact partners.  (Sec. 601)

21.  Tobacco Tax Enforcement.  House did not increase the number of minimum hours to be dedicated to enforcement from 8,320 to 16,600.  (Sec. 602)

22.  Motor Carrier Enforcement.  House did not include language requiring staff and resources necessary to enforce the motor carrier laws and regulations of the state.  (Sec. 604)

23.  Homeland Security.  House included language requiring grants go to first responders and grants to the City of Detroit not to be used to supplant general funds for existing operations.  (Sec. 703)

24.  Emergency Contingency Fund.  House included language describing new procedures for accessing emergency response funding as proposed by the Governor, but alters the amount of funds readily available from $800,000 to $500,000.  (Sec. 706)

25.  FY 2014-15 Appropriations Disclosure.  House did not include a requirement that the amounts for normal and legacy retirement costs be identified for FY 2015.  (Sec. 1203)

 

Date Completed:  4-30-13                                                                                                      Fiscal Analyst:  Bruce Baker

This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.