FY 2013-14 JUDICIARY BUDGET S.B. 191 (S-1): SUMMARY OF DIFFERENCES
House Bill is H.B. 4328
$273,709,000 |
|
|
1. Legacy Costs Separation. The Senate removed legacy costs for health care and pension from the individual lines items and centralized them in two new line items in the Supreme Court section of the bill. Legacy costs for health care are approximately $6.4 million and legacy costs for pension are approximately $7.3 million. Overall, the two legacy items are equivalent to 42.75% of payroll. The House did not adopt this alternative bill format. |
0 |
0 |
|
FY 2013-14 House-Passed Gross Appropriation.................................................................. |
$273,709,000 |
FY 2013-14 JUDICIARY BUDGET BOILERPLATE HIGHLIGHTS
Changes from FY 2013-14 Senate-Passed: |
1. State Restricted Fund Reporting. The Governor revised section to state that the Judiciary shall cooperate with the State Budget Office to provide a report to the Legislature on state restricted funds, instead of having the Judiciary provide the report. Senate concurred with Governor's changes, but the House retained current law. (Sec. 222) |
2. Drug Court Evaluation. The Senate removed subsection (3) which called for the drug court programming evaluation called for in this section to be consistent with the requirements of the Federal Byrne Grant for that program. The State Court Administrative Office (SCAO) indicated that the Byrne Grant flows through the Department of Michigan State Police and has its own evaluation requirements, so SCAO asked that the reference to the Byrne Grant in this section be removed. The House retained current law. (Sec. 310) |
3. Juvenile Placement Information. Both Senate and House added new language requiring SCAO to provide courts with a quarterly listing of out-of-state placements of juvenile offenders and an annual listing of per diem costs for both public and private residential facilities in the State of Michigan. House made minor language revisions. (Sec. 323) |
Date Completed: 4-30-13 Fiscal Analyst: Dan O'Connor
This analysis was prepared by nonpartisan Senate staff for use by the Senate in its deliberations and does not constitute an official statement of legislative intent.